February 3rd, 2020 
“Argue (ahem, debate intelligently!) with strangers on the internet”
For this option, review to the news article that was assigned in module 7.
Then, glance through the
Choose ONE public comment on the article, and copy & paste it into your post. In about 200 words (not including the comment you are responding to), write AS THOUGH you are replying to this person’s comment- but doing so as someone who has studied religion in the United States from a scholarly perspective.
Your grade will be based on the same criteria as always: level of engagement with class materials: 7 points; writing quality: 3 points.
As this is a debate, a range of perspectives are acceptable. However, to receive a strong score your comment must demonstrate thoughtful engagement with course materials such as the Neusner textbook, the lecture on Islam, and the lecture on Church/ State separation from Module 1.
**********************
Your post is due Friday, 2/7 by the end of the night (AZ time).
Though not required, I encourage you to read and comment on other posts within your group.
Grades will be based on:
-Depth of engagement with class materials (7/10 points)
-Writing quality (proper spelling, grammar, punctuation) (3/10 points)
Note: Please try to keep your responses down to the 200-word mark. While we will not necessarily take off points for posts that go OVER that length, the highest scores will be given to posts that demonstrate strong analytical depth while remaining close to the suggested word limit.
-files reading attached below . plus this link video.
-https://player.mediaamp.io/p/U8-EDC/qQivF4esrENw/embed/select/media/59z1oRSjDZKh?form=html
please read it right and do exactly what the instructions says, use your capitalization appropriate and parentheses too with with putting the right citation.
Posted in 