Read the following attached case study and answer these questions below.

1. How do you personally access the adequacy of the decision-making process that was used by Schmidt that lead to his directive to stop all procurement of goods and services associated with foundations that supported women’s reproductive rights? Elaborate the strengths and deficiencies associated with his judgment.

2. Does it make any difference in the case analysis if the nonprofit organization was a hospital, school, or religious-based organization, such as a church, temple, or synagogue? Please explain.

3. To what extent, do you think his directive voice violate the constitutional rights and employment rights of those who work in his organization? If yes, in what ways? If no, why not?